The PJIP recently published a report in the Blog of the APA looking into the results of the APA's Journal Surveys Project. You can read the full report on the APA's website here: 'Insights from the American Philosophical Association’s Journal Surveys Project'.

​Some philosophy journals have dedicated pages to display information about their acceptance rates, response times, etc. While the location of these pages is often similar for journals with the same publisher, beyond this there is little consensus regarding where journal statistics are displayed; nor is it clear what metrics you'll find, nor even if they are calculated in the same way (i.e. Springer journals display median for review times, while most others tend to use mean averages). ​

This changelog serves as a record of recent adjustments made to PJIP resources. These posts contain, for example, details about any new features, new metrics, additional journals, or changes/corrections to existing information.
​

The PJIP Directory contains a large amount of information, many abbreviations, and advanced tools for searching and filtering. Given this, the usefulness of the resource is easily inhibited by its complexity. To help, this post explains the data contained within the directory and guides users on how to navigate some of the directory's more intricate tools. ​

The are many ways of evaluating and ranking philosophy journals. This post details some of the most common metrics used to rank Philosophy Journals and explains how to use them to assess journal quality. Rankings covered include SJR, SNIP, % Cited, CiteScore, Impact Factor, H-Index (Google Scholar Rankings), Acceptance Rates, Number of submissions, Leiter Philosophy journal rankings, and other academic polls.